Archive for May, 2009

A Green Bank

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

President Obama has emphasized the development of green technologies, not only as a way of solving environmental problems such as climate change, but also as a way of stimulating the economy. No sector of the economy appears primed to pull us out of the recession. Only a new technology that creates jobs and mobilizes people across the economy will suffice.

But the problem in a serious recession driven by problems in the financial sector is that most investors will shy away from investing in new, risky technologies that might not pay off. Many of the green technologies are untested and involve large infrastructure projects that may face many obstacles and will take a long time to get off the ground. The reconstruction of our electrical grid to transport wind/solar power from one part of the country to another, is one such project.

Thus, the proposal by Karen Kornbluth and John Podesta, to create a “Green Bank” seems to be precisely what we need.

Working in partnership with the private sector, a well constructed, public Green Bank would open credit markets and motivate businesses to invest again. It would enable clean-energy technologies—in such areas as wind, solar, geothermal, advanced biomass, and energy efficiency—to be deployed on a large scale and become commercially viable at current electricity costs.

And see this report from Mariah Blake at the Washington Monthly on the importance and obstacles to a digital electric power system.

Why the Old Growth Won’t Return

Monday, May 25th, 2009

One very straightforward way of thinking about the current economic crisis is that some investment bankers, seeking quick profit with little risk, developed some unusual and unworkable investment instruments. And because of a deregulated environment where no one was paying attention to what they were doing, these investment instruments enabled lots of bad loans, especially in the housing sector. This created a bubble—an inflated housing market—that burst sending the economy into a tailspin.

Once the bad loans are off the books and housing prices are stabilized we can return to the kind of growth rates that we had before the crisis.

I get the impression that lots of people expect something like this after the recession.

But there is another story to be told, one that is less optimistic. The alternative story is that easy credit is not something that appeared over the last few years but has been expanding over the past few decades, fueling what we now think of as modern consumerism—middle class people with the ability to buy lots of stuff. But this expansion of credit was not based on improving real wages for the middle class. Thus, for many years people were borrowing money that they had no realistic means of paying back, while paying exorbitant interest on that money to the bankers. The collapse of the housing market was just the “straw that broke the camel’s back”—an event that triggered the collapse of a financial bubble that had been building for years.

Via Kevin Drum, this chart suggests the alternative story is the right one.

Blog_Real_Income_1979_2007

 

The chart shows, since 1979,  an enormous leap in real income for the top 1%, some modest growth for the next 19%, and for everyone else almost nothing. Yet, this flat growth in real income for most Americans is accompanied by a plummeting savings rate for the middle class and an explosion in consumption fueled by credit.

The conclusion to draw from this is that the growth rates of the past 30 years were based on nothing but financial shenanigans and delusional spending. If so, we will not be able to return to previous growth rates even once there is a economic turn around.

This means a fundamental shift in how Americans conceptualize a good life. It also suggests that no matter how successful Obama is at ending the Great Recession, he will face a frustrated electorate in the future.

 

Evil Rising

Thursday, May 21st, 2009

In Reviving the Left, I argue that contemporary conservatism sees itself as the last bulwark in a historic battle against evil that demands the most extraordinary measures—torture, state secrecy, warrantless wiretaps, and perpetual war.

This conceit is best exemplified by former Vice President Dick Cheney, whose speech yesterday on national security before an audience at  the American Enterprise Institute, included 21 references to 9/11 and tried to make the case that Obama’s policies put the nation at risk.

It is obvious that Republicans have decided they have one path back to power—a new terrorist attack on American soil.

Prior to Cheney’s speech, over the past few weeks, Republicans have obsessively repeated claims that Obama’s national security policies are reckless, and that these charges will benefit the GOP in the future.

If there is another terrorist attack they will blame Obama’s unwillingness to use torture, hoping that a fearful public will return to the the tender mercies of the Republican Party.

It is not a bad strategy. I am sure there are a few million quislings inhabiting the spineless center of American politics who will find the fearmongering of conservatives reassuring.