Posts Tagged ‘Obama’

GOP Does Not Take National Security Seriously

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Anyone still holding onto the delusion that the Republican Party is genuinely concerned about national security need only look to the recent antics of Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) to know the ugly truth.

DeMint is blocking the confirmation of a Transportation Security Administration Administrator because of a question about nominee Errol Southers’ position on collective-bargaining.

Let’s reflect. On Christmas Day, a flight bound for Detroit, Michigan was almost blown up with explosive chemicals and 300 lives were nearly lost. Our President is behaving respectfully and appropriately, admitting that it was a “systemic failure” and taking steps to assess and then fix the problem.

Republicans like DeMint, on the other hand, are using it as an opportunity to gain political ground by criticizing the President for his word choices and forcing the country to go without a director of the TSA – the agency responsible for flight safety and security.

Americans who are serious about the safety of this country support the ethical and efficient operation of the agencies designed to protect us and the leadership of a President who will take the situation – and our lives – seriously.

Spit out the Obama hater-ade

Thursday, October 15th, 2009

Every time I turn around, someone is hating on Obama. So, I in turn, hate on the haters. And lets be honest, they deserve it. On one hand, we’ve got right-wing tea baggers comparing him to Hitler and on the other, we’ve got left-wingers complaining that he hasn’t rid the world of evil in 8 months.

Sometimes I get so weighed down by all the ignorance, impatience and hostility that I forget about all the other people who are celebrating the accomplishments and potential of Obama’s presidency.

So, in that spirit, check out these two badass blog posts in defense of Obama earning the Nobel Peace Prize:

Juan Cole writes a scathing critique of conservatives who mock Obama’s receipt of the award, and lays out the case for why he was chosen:

Barack Obama was given the prize because he is a game-changer. Obama has dedicated himself to reducing and ultimately scrapping the nuclear arsenals that threaten the world with nuclear winter or a destruction of the ozone layer; either event would be catastrophic for human beings’ existence on the planet. Obama has already made a substantial change in relations between the US and the Muslim world. Two years ago we were talking about whether Cheney could convince Americans to go to war on Iran. Now Washington is engaging in direct talks with Tehran that have eased tensions.

Dwight Furrow argues that it is Obama’s commitment to governing from a moral center that prioritizes hope, trust and compassion that has earned him the award:

The decision to be guided by moral purpose is a fateful and monumental act, because it determines whether we approach each day with hope or fear, emotions that regulate our sense of what is possible and what is not. Obama’s rhetoric of hope is not empty and not a mere aspiration. That hope conquers fear is a necessary condition for stable cooperation….All peacemakers have one thing in common—they are willing to take the first step toward peace, which is always a gratuitous act of faith with no assurance it will be reciprocated. Obama has announced to the world that the U.S. is willing to take that step. As with the other recipients of the prize, he confronts destructive forces with an act of generosity. Unlike most of the other recipients, he does so from a position of power. The powerful renouncing power is an event sufficiently rare to warrant celebration despite lacking personal sacrifice.

I really do believe that President Obama is on to something with his leadership style that encourages care and social responsibility. Of course he is not perfect, but as Cole, Furrow, and the goddamn Nobel Committee say, he’s a big time game changer, and thats something we can’t afford to pass up.

LGBTQI Community for Public Health Care

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

Maybe its just me, but I’ve noticed a disturbing lack of a Queer advocacy presence in the health care debate. In fact, some LGBT organizations are endorsing Republicans who are actively trying to defeat a public option.

This makes it crucial that LGBTQI folks and our allies not only speak out in favor of a public health care option, but also encourage the organizations that claim to represent us to do the same.

Take Action by signing QueerToday.com’s petition that calls on President Obama and LBGTQI organizations to actively support health care reform with a robust public option!

From the petition:

LGBTQ Youth face an epidemic of homelessness. Transgender people are often without healthcare, jobs, or homes. LGBTQ families often lack legal protections to ensure health care coverage for all of their family members.

Because the LGBTQ community is especially impacted by our country’s lack of affordable quality health care,

We the undersigned demand:

1. President Obama insist that a robust public option be a part of any health care reform options.

2. That major LGBTQ organizations speak-up in favor of a robust public health care option for the health of our community.