Archive for the ‘Domestic Policy’ Category

They Just Never Go Away

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

Republicans are hard at work trying to blame Obama for the Gulf Oil spill. But there is evidence that the real culprit may be our old friend Dick Cheney. (Remember him?)

Political philosopher William Galston presents the case:

Apparently, late in the Clinton Administration, the Interior Department’s Mineral Management Service (MMS) wanted an automatic shut off switch installed on deep oil drilling platforms that was essential in preventing underwater spills. But the oil industry opposed this regulation because of the cost of installing this device. And in 2003 the Interior Department relented.

But as Galston reports:

After the Bush administration took office, the MMS became a cesspool of corruption and conflicts of interest. In September 2008, Earl Devaney, Interior’s Inspector General, delivered a report to Secretary Dirk Kempthorne that has to be read to be believed. One section, headlined “A Culture of Ethical Failure,” documented the belief among numerous MMS staff that they were “exempt from the rules that govern all other employees of the Federal Government.”…On at least 135 occasions, they accepted gifts and gratuities from oil and gas companies with whom they worked.

Galston is curious:

So here’s my question: what is responsible for the [Mineral Management Service's] change of heart between 2000 and 2003 on the crucial issue of requiring a remote control switch for offshore rigs? What we do know is that unfettered oil drilling was to Dick Cheney’s domestic concerns what the invasion of Iraq was to his foreign policy—a core objective, implacably pursued regardless of the risks. Is there a connection between his infamous secret energy task force and the corrupt mindset that came to dominate a key program within MMS? Would $500,000 per rig have been regarded as an unacceptably expensive insurance policy if a drill-baby-drill administration hadn’t placed its thumb so heavily on the scale?

Halliburton, the company run by Cheney prior to his selection as Bush’s VP, was responsible for the drilling procedure called “cementing” which is known to be a leading cause of well blowouts and had been completed just prior to the recent explosion.

It is worth asking whether a conflict of interest played a role in this disaster.

How many years will it take to free us from the consequences of the worst Presidential Administration in U.S. history?

Support for Arizona Immigration Bill is No Surprise

Sunday, May 2nd, 2010

People from across the ideological spectrum are condemning Arizona’s new immigration statute. Few GOP leaders have endorsed it and it has been condemned by religious leaders and newspaper editorial boards across the country

But according to a recent poll, the public narrowly supports it.

Americans familiar with Arizona’s tough, new immigration law tend to favor it, a new poll found.

51 percent of those who have heard of Arizona’s new law to crack down illegal immigration said they generally favor it, a new Gallup Poll found Thursday. 39 of those who have heard of the law opposed it, while 11 percent were unsure.

Steve Benen is surprised:

I find this very hard to believe, not because Gallup is unreliable, but because I like to think the American character is decent and strong, and would resist efforts like these.

But frankly, this doesn’t surprise me at all. It is in fact an accurate reflection of the United States at this point in its history—bigoted, selfish, angry, and looking for scapegoats. Recall that this is a public that put a selfish, deceitful moron in the White House for eight  years. This is a public that was excited beyond measure at bombing the hell out of a weak, largely irrelevant country that had done nothing provocative. This is a country that still denies consenting adults the right to marry, and will vote to shred our educational system in order to hang on to a few dollars every year that would otherwise go to taxes.

We are a deeply conservative country with a powerful authoritarian streak and one election will not change that.

Student Loans

Monday, February 8th, 2010

The New York Times reports that the Obama Administration’s student-loan reform package is in jeopardy. A reform bill has passed the House of Representatives but it languishes in the Senate where the bank lobbyists hold court.

The reform is in trouble because of—Republican opposition. Who could have guessed?

The current student loan program is a government subsidy for banks. The government provides banks with money to lend to students and pays banks a fee for their trouble. The federal government also guarantees the loan so the banks incur no risk.

The proposed reform would simply have the government lend directly to students bypassing the banks altogether saving an estimated $87 Billion over ten  years.

So Republicans who are constantly complaining about budget deficits are opposed to a simple idea that reduces the budget while enabling more students to attend school.

Anyone who thinks Republicans are genuinely concerned about budget deficits is a fool. They are fine with government spending as long as it is lining the pockets of private corporations.