Archive for the ‘Reviving the Left’ Category

How Quickly They Forget

Thursday, April 8th, 2010

Political philosopher William Galston points to a disturbing trend in a recent poll:

The daily commentary about the Obama era has largely overlooked a trend that is now unmistakable—namely, the growing conservative sentiment in this country that goes well beyond the tea-party rallies and Glenn Beck’s rants.

Gallup offered the first piece of compelling evidence. On January 7, 2010, it reported that self-identified conservatives had increased from an average of 37 percent of the electorate in 2008 to 40 percent in 2009. (By contrast, moderates and liberals each decreased by one percentage point during that period.) Gallup based its conclusion on a synthesis of surveys taken throughout 2009, with a total sample of nearly 22 thousand and a margin of error of less than +/- one percentage point. It found, moreover, that ideological shifts among independents—a three-point drop in moderate identifiers, coupled with a five point-gain in conservative identifiers—accounted for most of the overall change.

Galston argues that this is part of a long-term increase in the polarization of the electorate—moderates over the past 30 years have increasingly identified with either liberalism or conservatism. But the recent shift is clearly toward conservatism. I suppose that is to be expected in the midst of a long recession with high unemployment.

But it is troubling that, in two short years, a significant number of people have simply forgotten that our current difficulties are the direct consequence of disastrous conservative governance.

It is troubling but not surprising. As I argued in Reviving the Left, conservative values are the default position in this country. When things go wrong, the source of the problem is always the government (or the urban, educated elites who run it), and  authoritarianism and individualism will always appear to be the solution.

It is the American way.

Philosophy Talk

Wednesday, February 17th, 2010

I am giving a talk on Friday for our Occasional Lecture Series at Mesa College.

The title is “How an Ethics of Care Can Transform Politics.”

It is open to the public so if you are interested in politics, ethics, and their intersection (and you live in San Diego) check it out.

The talk will be on Friday at 12:00 noon in LRC (Library Resource Center) 435.

 

More Like Grayson

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Representative Alan Grayson (D, FL) is getting some bad reviews from the mainstream press. But this is to be expected. The mainstream press hates anyone who disrupts their cozy narratives.

First it was his comment, “If you get sick, America, the Republicans’ health care plan is this: Die quickly.” Then, appearing on MSNBC, he said of former Vice President Dick Cheney: “I have trouble listening to what he says sometimes because of the blood that drips from his teeth while he’s talking.” Finally, a radio interview surfaced in which he had called a female adviser to the Federal Reserve chairman “a K Street whore” — a reference to her former job as a Washington lobbyist. That one forced him to make a formal apology.

But this is exactly the kind of rhetoric Democrats need.

The country is divided between two opposing ideologies with very little middle ground on which to construct bi-partisan compromise. The financial collapse, the plight of homeowners, the sluggish economy, and persistent high unemployment have everyone in the country in a foul mood and poised to throw-the-bums-out if things don’t turn around.

And the bums are Democrats since they are in power.

Being nice to the other side will produce few results and will make Democrats appear to lack commitment to their ideas.

The Republicans have their tired anti-government, anti-liberal rhetoric, which will appeal to many voters who are looking for easy answers and who quickly forget the role Republicans played in creating this mess.

Meanwhile, the Democrats have their heads buried in policy statements trying to devise solutions to problems that may not be solvable in the short run. The rhetoric that councils patience in the face of challenges and promises technical competence will not quell the anger seething in the electorate.

Grayson offers something different—a Democrat who plays the blame game and is unapologetic when he calls out Republicans for their feckless disregard for average Americans. And in using the language of blame he is using explicitly moral language that reminds voters of the moral bankruptcy of conservatism.

Grayson bluntly tells it like it is—our problems resulted from Republican policies and their twisted values. Unless Democrats hammer that home in the strongest possible terms they will lose in 2101.

We need more like Grayson. Obama’s cool competence helped him win the last election, but it may not be sufficient to win the next one.