<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Su Casa es Mi Casa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.revivingliberalism.com/su-casa-es-mi-casa/2009/06/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.revivingliberalism.com/su-casa-es-mi-casa/2009/06/</link>
	<description>The Home of Rootstock Liberalism</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 06:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: How to Succeed at Climate Change Negotiations &#171; Philosophy On The Mesa</title>
		<link>http://www.revivingliberalism.com/su-casa-es-mi-casa/2009/06/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Succeed at Climate Change Negotiations &#171; Philosophy On The Mesa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revivingliberalism.com/?p=350#comment-105</guid>
		<description>[...] we get less CO2 reduction than we need, although some is better than none. But China loses too—their pollution problem is enormous and is a direct threat to their prosperity. It would be completely irrational on their part to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we get less CO2 reduction than we need, although some is better than none. But China loses too—their pollution problem is enormous and is a direct threat to their prosperity. It would be completely irrational on their part to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why the U.S. Must Lead on Climate Change. &#124; Rants &#38; Reasons</title>
		<link>http://www.revivingliberalism.com/su-casa-es-mi-casa/2009/06/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Why the U.S. Must Lead on Climate Change. &#124; Rants &#38; Reasons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.revivingliberalism.com/?p=350#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] we get less CO2 reduction than we need, although some is better than none. But China loses too—their pollution problem is enormous and is a direct threat to their prosperity. It would be completely irrational on their part to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we get less CO2 reduction than we need, although some is better than none. But China loses too—their pollution problem is enormous and is a direct threat to their prosperity. It would be completely irrational on their part to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

