Posts Tagged ‘Ayn Rand’

A 21st Century Randian Doing God’s Work

Monday, November 9th, 2009

Ayn Rand wasn’t a big fan of religion or freepers who live off the public dime. But her acolytes seem to miss those nuances.

Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein in the London Sunday Times was explaining why he and his fellow bankers are so talented and essential that the rest of us should just bow and scrape while we open up our wallets to pay for their yachts.

Blankfein is one of the geniuses who nearly destroyed the world financial system and was able to survive only because of the $12 Billion he received from the taxpayers.

He understands that “people are pissed off, mad, and bent out of shape” at bankers’ actions. …”I know I could slit my wrists and people would cheer,” he says. But then, he slowly begins to argue the case for modern banking. “We’re very important,” he says, abandoning self-flagellation. “We help companies to grow by helping them to raise capital. Companies that grow create wealth. This, in turn, allows people to have jobs that create more growth and more wealth. It’s a virtuous cycle.” To drive home his point, he makes a remarkably bold claim. “We have a social purpose.” […]

So, it’s business as usual, then, regardless of whether it makes most people howl at the moon with rage? Goldman Sachs, this pillar of the free market, breeder of super-citizens, object of envy and awe will go on raking it in, getting richer than God? An impish grin spreads across Blankfein’s face. Call him a fat cat who mocks the public. Call him wicked. Call him what you will. He is, he says, just a banker “doing God’s work”

Creating dicey mortgages and investment ponzi schemes is God’s work? This must be the latest version of the prosperity gospel. Only in 21st Century America could a corporate welfare queen say this with a straight face. If that isn’t delusional enough, he then goes on to claim that if the bankers go down they will take the rest of us with them.

Does Blankfein not acknowledge that it is maddening for most of us to watch Goldman gobble up so much cash while we struggle? Quite the opposite. He insists we should be celebrating his bank’s success, not condemning it. “Everybody should be, frankly, happy,” he says. Can he be serious? Deadly. Goldman’s performance, he argues, is the firmest indication of a nascent economic recovery that will benefit not just him and his firm but all of us. “The financial system led us into the crisis and it will lead us out.”

… “I’ve got news for you,” he shoots back, eyes narrowing. “If the financial system goes down, our business is going down and, trust me, yours and everyone else’s is going down, too.”

We’ve been shoveling money at the rich for the last few decades and that has nearly brought us to ruin. Now they intend to blackmail us for the table scraps and want moral praise to boot!

Blessed are the bankers for they shall indeed inherit the earth.

 

Heroes of the Free Market

Sunday, October 18th, 2009

The titans of Wall St.—those fearless risk-takers who keep our economy going with their steely determination, grit, and superior intelligence—are once again making money hand over fist.

The recent share market rally on Wall Street has most economists tipping the worst of the global financial crisis might be over.
That optimism was underscored today when the big investment bank Goldman Sachs reported a surge in its third quarter profit to more than $US3 billion.

We should all bow to them as exemplars of the true American enterprising spirit while reverently thumbing the dog-eared pages of Atlas Shrugged.

I guess Rand is proven right once again.

But as this article in the NY Times makes clear, these profits have little to do with courage, enterprise, or intelligence:

It may come as a surprise that one of the most powerful forces driving the resurgence on Wall Street is not the banks but Washington. Many of the steps that policy makers took last year to stabilize the financial system — reducing interest rates to near zero, bolstering big banks with taxpayer money, guaranteeing billions of dollars of financial institutions’ debts — helped set the stage for this new era of Wall Street wealth.

The recent success of some banks is a case study in the degree to which economic success in this country is never the product of individual genius or initiative alone. People who make a lot of money do so because social and political arrangements enable them to make it.

But even in an article that makes this transparently clear, the language of individual initiative is still dominant.

A big reason for Goldman Sachs’s blowout profits this year has been the willingness of its traders to take big risks — they have put more money on the line while other banks that suffered last year have reined in such moves. Executives say there are big strategic gaps opening up between banks on Wall Street that are taking on more risks, and those that are treading a safer path.

But it is not a risk if the government is guaranteeing you will not fail.

“All of this is facilitated by the Federal Reserve and the government, who really want financial institutions to get back to lending,” said Gary Richardson, a research fellow at the National Bureau of Economic Research. “But we have just shown them that they can have the most frightening things happen to them, and we will throw trillions of dollars to protect them. I have big concerns about that.”

If anyone is taking risks it is the American taxpayer.

The very language the media uses to describe an ordinary news event presupposes an utterly misleading explanation of what is happening that reinforces the patently ridiculous notion of big business bureaucrats as cultural heroes.

That is part (but only part) of the reason why Rand’s books still sell.